JOURNAL ARTICLES
& Book Chapters
Asterisks indicate refereed publications; sole-authored unless otherwise indicated.
Treatment of missing data determines conclusions regarding moralizing gods
Beheim, Bret, Quentin Atkinson, Joseph Bulbulia, Will Gervais, Russell Gray, Joseph Henrich, Martin Lang, M. Willis Monroe, Michael Muthukrishna, Ara Norenzayan, Benjamin Purzycki, Azim Shariff, Edward Slingerland, Rachel Spicer, Aiyana Willard. 2021. “Treatment of missing data determines conclusions regarding moralizing gods,” (PDF) Nature 595: E29-34. *
This Matters Arising critiques a 2019 Nature article by Whitehouse, et al. (since retracted) that used the Seshat archaeo-historical databank to argue that beliefs in moralizing gods appear in world history only after the formation of complex “megasocieties” of around one million people. Inspection of the authors’ data shows that 61% of Seshat data points on moralizing gods are missing values, mostly from smaller populations below one million people, and during the analysis the authors re-coded these data points to signify the absence of moralizing gods beliefs. When we confine the analysis only to the extant data or use various standard imputation methods, the reported finding is reversed: moralizing gods precede increases in social complexity.
Supernatural agents and prosociality in historical China: micro-modeling the cultural evolution of gods and morality in textual corpora
Nichols, Ryan, Edward Slingerland, Kristoffer Neilbo, Peter Kirby and Carson Logan. 2021. “Supernatural agents and prosociality in historical China: micro-modeling the cultural evolution of gods and morality in textual corpora,” Religion Brain and Behavior 11: 46-64. *
Historians Respond to Whitehouse et al. (2019), “Complex Societies Precede Moralizing Gods Throughout World History”
Slingerland, Edward, M. Willis Monroe, Brenton Sullivan, Robyn Faith Walsh, Daniel Veidlinger, William Noseworthy, Conn Herriott, Ben Raffield, Janine Larmon Peterson, Gretel Rodríguez, Karen Sonik, William Green, Frederick S. Tappenden, Amir Ashtari, Rachel Spicer, Michael Muthukrishna, “Historians Respond to Whitehouse et al. 2019, ‘Complex societies precede moralizing gods throughout world history,’” (PDF) Journal of Cognitive Historiography 5: 1-2 (2020). *
A critique of the Seshat Databank coding methodology used in Whitehouse et al. 2019
Exploring the Challenges and Potentialities of the Database of Religious History for Cognitive Historiography
Brenton Sullivan, Michael Muthukrishna, Frederick Tappenden and Edward Slingerland, “Exploring the Challenges and Potentialities of the Database of Religious History for Cognitive Historiography,” (PDF) Journal of Cognitive Historiography 3:1-2: 12-31 (2018). *
Introduction: Religion, Digital Humanities, and Cognitive Historiography
Tappenden, Frederick and Edward Slingerland. “Introduction: Religion, Digital Humanities, and Cognitive Historiography,” (PDF) Journal of Cognitive Historiography 3:1-2: 7-11 (2018). *
China as the Radical “Other”: Lessons for the Cognitive Science of Religion
“China as the Radical “Other”: Lessons for the Cognitive Science of Religion,” in Religious Cognition in China: “Homo Religiosus” and the Dragon, ed. Ryan Hornbeck, Justin Barrett and Madeleine Kang, pp. 55-75. Springer. *
Durkheim with Data: The Database of Religious History
Slingerland, Edward and Brenton Sullivan. “Durkheim With Data: The Database of Religious History (DRH),” (PDF) Journal of the American Academy of Religion 85.2: 312-347 (2017). *
Parochial prosocial religions: Historical and contemporary evidence for a cultural evolutionary process
Norenzayan, Ara, Azim Shariff, Aiyana Willard, Edward Slingerland, Will Gervais, Rita McNamara and Joseph Henrich. “Parochial Prosocial Religions: Historical and Contemporary Evidence for a Cultural Evolutionary Process.” (PDF) Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2016).
The cultural evolution of prosocial religions
Norenzayan, Ara, Azim Shariff, Aiyana Willard, Edward Slingerland, Will Gervais, Rita McNamara and Joseph Henrich. “The Cultural Evolution of Prosocial Religions,” (PDF) Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2014). *
Toward a Second Wave of Consilience in the Cognitive Scientific Study of Religion
“Toward a Second Wave of Consilience in the Cognitive Scientific Study of Religion” , (PDF) Journal for Cognitive Historiography 1.1: 121-130 (2013). *
The Evolution of Prosocial Religions
Slingerland, Edward, Joseph Henrich and Ara Norenzayan. “The Evolution of Prosocial Religions,” (PDF) in Cultural Evolution: Strüngmann Forum Reports, Vol. 12, ed. Peter Richerson and Morton Christiansen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (2013). *
Cognitive Science and Religious Thought: The Case of Psychological Interiority in the Analects
“Cognitive Science and Religious Thought: The Case of Psychological Interiority in the Analects,” (PDF) in Mental Culture: Classical Social Theory and the Cognitive Science of Religion, ed. Dimitris Xygalatas and Lee McCorkle. London: Acumen Publishing, Religion, Cognition and Culture Series (2013). *
A Historical Database of Sociocultural Evolution
Turchin, Peter, Harvey Whitehouse, Pieter François, Edward Slingerland and Mark Collard. “A Historical Database of Sociocultural Evolution.” (PDF) Cliodynamics: The Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical History 3: 271–293 (December 2012).
Back to the Future: A Response to Martin and Wiebe
“Back to the Future: A Response to Martin and Wiebe,” (PDF) Journal of the American Academy of Religion 80.3: 611-617 (2012).
Religious Studies as a Life Science
Bulbulia, Joseph and Edward Slingerland. “Religious Studies as a Life Science,” (PDF) Numen 59.5: 564–613 (2012). *
Evolutionary science and the study of religion
Slingerland, Edward and Joseph Bulbulia. “Evolutionary Science and the Study of Religion,” (PDF) Religion 41.3: 307-328 (September 2011). *
Who's Afraid of Reductionism? The Study of Religion in the Age of Cognitive Science
“Who’s Afraid of Reductionism? The Study of Religion in the Age of Cognitive Science,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76.2 (June 2008): 375-411. *
Accompanied by “Reply to Cho & Squier” (418-419) and “Response to Cho & Squier” (449-454).
As of December 2012, this article was listed by JAAR as its #1 most cited article.